Comment on Beyond CMS quality measure adjustments.
نویسنده
چکیده
To the Editor: We wish to compliment Dr Susan D. Horn and colleagues on their clinical trial, ‘‘Beyond CMS quality measure adjustments: Identifying key resident and nursing home facility factors associated with quality measures.’’ Their summary of the controversies surrounding the quality care improvement efforts assist in paving the way for a clearer vision and methodology to positively impact quality measures for care providers and staff in nursing home facilities. We also applaud the need to adjust for resident admission characteristics, facility characteristics, and state reimbursement systems when creating new quality measures. Quality of care can bemeasured by using either processes or outcomes. Each method has its strength and limitations. Using processes rather than outcomes, according to Shekelle and colleagues, is a more efficient measure of quality care in vulnerable elders, with interdisciplinary team work as a main frame to be followed in geriatric care, especially in nursing homes and in the post acute care settings. Defining clear quality care measures continues to face considerable challenges. Lack of clinical geriatric research trials with a focus on quality measures and the rising cost of nursing homes and medical costs continues to have a significant impact on future outlook. However, there are some points that should be highlighted that are relevant to the article. First, all patients in this study were from for-profit nursing homes. The corporate organization of nursing homes has an affect on quality of care and services provided. Not-forprofit nursing homes may provide higher-quality care than for-profit nursing homes. According to Carter and Porell, nursing home characteristics such as profit status, nurse staffing patterns, facility size, chain affiliation, and percentage of Medicaidand Medicare-reimbursed days significantly influence nursing home residents’ risk. Broader area market factors also appear to contribute. Not-for-profit homes have less pressure to maximize profits compared with for-profit homes. Second, the case mix of residents in this study under the general term of nursing homes should be clarified, because many nursing homes have an interest and focus on post acute care, with skilled care provided to a wide range of medically complex patients. Subacute care settings have medical, rehabilitation, and skilled nursing services provided for patients who are not in the acute phase of their illness but require a higher level of care than can be provided in a long-term care setting. Third, most quality measures need to be condition specific, focusing on how care is received by patients during the study. Clarifying details about each of the 3 quality measures used in the article includes the different stages of pressure ulcers used, the severity and type of urinary incontinence, and the level of impairment in activities of daily living. Also, the level of
منابع مشابه
Beyond CMS quality measure adjustments: identifying key resident and nursing home facility factors associated with quality measures.
OBJECTIVE This quality improvement (QI) project was initiated to understand what differentiates nursing homes (NHs) that perform well on publicly reported Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Measures (QMs). The intent was to assist NH staff to direct QI efforts to positively impact QM rates. A key step was to determine if any resident or facility characteristics might accou...
متن کاملBeyond Compassion: Replacing a Blame Culture With Proper Emotional Support and Management; Comment on “Why and How Is Compassion Necessary to Provide Good Quality Healthcare?”
The absence of compassion, argues the author, is not the cause of healthcare failures but rather a symptom of deeper systemic failures. The clinical encounter arouses strong emotions of anxiety, fear, and anger in patients which are often projected onto the clinicians. Attempts to protect clinicians through various bureaucratic devices and depersonalization of the patient, constitute as Menzies...
متن کاملSome Notes on Critical Appraisal of Prevalence Studies; Comment on: “The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews Addressing Questions of Prevalence”
Decisions in healthcare should be based on information obtained according to the principles of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). An increasing number of systematic reviews are published which summarize the results of prevalence studies. Interpretation of the results of these reviews should be accompanied by an appraisal of the methodological quality of the included data and studies. The critical a...
متن کاملGoing beyond the Hero in Leadership Development: The Place of Healthcare Context, Complexity and Relationships; Comment on “Leadership and Leadership Development in Healthcare Settings – A Simplistic Solution to Complex Problems?”
There remains a conviction that the torrent of publications and the financial outlay on leadership development will create managers with the skills and characters of perfect leaders, capable of guiding healthcare organisations through the challenges and crises of the 21st century. The focus of much attention continues to be the search for the (illusory) core set of heroic qualities, abilities o...
متن کاملBeyond the Black Box Approach to Ethics!; Comment on “Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy”
In the editorial published in this journal, Daniels and colleagues argue that his and Sabin’s accountability for reasonableness (A4R) framework should be used to handle ethical issues in the health technology assessment (HTA)-process, especially concerning fairness. In contrast to this suggestion, it is argued that such an approach risks suffering from the irrrelevance or insufficiency they war...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
دوره 12 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011